Legal Opinion

Hollywood Shoe Polish, Inc. v. Knomark Manufacturing Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1959Published

1Opinion of the CourtNicholas M. Pette, J.

Plaintiff and defendant apply for rulings on objections to questions asked by each of the other on examinations before trial, in an action brought by plaintiff for a permanent injunction and damages against the defendant for trade-mark infringement and unfair competition.

Plaintiff was examined before trial first, and the examination established that plaintiff is claiming damages by reason of the defendant’s alleged infringement of plaintiff’s trade-mark. *368Defendant’s counsel, in the course of his inquiry into the issue of plaintiff’s damages asked questions and requested production of records…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Drake v. HerrmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  2. Griffin Manufacturing Co. v. Gold Dust Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
  3. Hillick v. Edwards & SonNew York Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Crandall v. Ford Motor Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  5. Dacchille v. Pepsi-Cola Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API