Legal Opinion
Hillick v. Edwards & Son
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 14, 1932PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Lewis, Edmund H., J.
In each of the above-captioned actions the plaintiff alleges that she has suffered injurious consequences from the use of “ Koremlu Cream,” a depilatory preparation which, it is claimed, was negligently, carelessly and illegally prepared by the defendants Kora M. Lublin “ and/or ” Koremlu, Inc., in that it contained certain chemicals or drugs which were poisonous and dangerous to human life and health; that said Koremlu cream was ^misrepresented and sold by the defendant retailers E. W. Edwards & Son and Abraham & Straus, Inc., with reckless disregard of injurious…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Martin v. HerzogNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Brown v. ShyneNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Marine Trust Co. v. Nuway Devices, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
- Buehler v. BushAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- Wertheim v. GrombeckerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Klauber v. S. K. E. Operating Co.New York Supreme Court · 1937
- Jacobowitz v. KremerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1946
- American Seal-Kap Corp. v. Smith Lee Co.New York Supreme Court · 1935
- Jacobs v. E. W. Edwards & SonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
- Taylor v. L. C. Smith & Corona Typewriters, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1942
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.