State ex rel. Nash v. Madson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Mandamus, brought in the district court for Polk county, by the .relator, treasurer of school-district No. 3, in that county, to compel the respondent, treasurer of the city of Bast Grand Forks, to pay over to him the sum of $3,710, received by respondent, as such city treasurer, in payment for licenses for the sale of intoxicating liquors in the city. The relator appeals from an order of Mills, J., quashing the writ.
1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.
The only question presented by this record which we need to consider at length, is whether section 6, c. 25, Sp. Laws 1889, is invalid and ineffectual because the subject thereof is not expressed *439in the title of the act, or because more than one subject is embraced in the law. It is entitled “An act to amend an act entitled ‘An act to incorporate the city of East Grand Forks in Polk county,’ approved March 7, 1887,” and the respondent’s claim is that it is repugnant to the provisions of section 27, art. 4, of the state constitution, — an article which has been discussed .and passed upon by…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. CassidySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
- Underwood v. McDuffeeMichigan Supreme Court · 1867
- State ex rel. Rice v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
3Cited by15 opinions
- State ex rel. Olsen v. Board of Control of State InstitutionsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- Seamer v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- State Ex Rel. Grozbach v. Common School District No. 65Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- State ex rel. Olson v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- State v. CourtneyMontana Supreme Court · 1903
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.