Stewart v. Philadelphia, W. & B. R.
Superior Court of Delaware
Action on the case for damages for personal injuries. The facts appear in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Comegys, C. J„,
(charging the jury.) The plaintiff, having. *453been injured while in the service of the defendant, on the 21st of June, 1880, as a tinsmith, at work upon a passenger car being repaired in its car-shop in this city, has brought this action against the defendant to recover for the damages resulting to him from such injury; he averring that the casualty that befell him grew out of the negligence of the defendant in not apprising him of the approaching danger. His work was, at the time mentioned, to cover with tin a gas-pipe which ran along on top of the car, and which was to supply…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Winkler v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1902
- Fort Worth & Rio Grande Railway Co. v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1904
- Louth v. ThompsonSuperior Court of Delaware · 1897
- Chielinsky v. Hoopes & Townsend Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1894
- Huber v. Jackson & Sharp Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1895
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.