Legal Opinion

F. B. Vandegrift & Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided November 24, 1971No. 5375, C.A.D. 1034Published

1Opinion of the Court

Worley, Chief Judge.

The importer appeals from the judgment of the Customs Court, Second Division,1 sustaining the collector’s classification of imported belting for machinery under item 355.80, TSUS,2 which reads:

Woven or knit fabrics (except pile or tufted fabrics), of textile materials, coated or filled with rubber or plasties material, or laminated with sheet rubber or plastics, except foam or sponge sheet:

‡ ‡ $

355.80 Of man-made fibers_25$ per-lb. +30% ad val.

One of the classifications appellant unsuccessfully sought before the Customs Court, and the only one contended for here, is under…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. R. H. MacY & Co., Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
  2. R. H. Macy & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  3. F. B. Vandegrift & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API