R. H. Macy & Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Kao, Chief Judge:
Placed in controversy by the above enumerated protest is the proper classification for customs duty purposes of a shipment from France invoiced as embroidered curtains in chief value of acetate fabric and hand-painted panels in chief value of polyester fabric. The customs authorities classified the embroidered curtains within the provisions of item 365.85 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States and assessed duty thereon at the rate of 42% per centum ad valorem. The hand-painted panels were classified within the purview of item 367.60 of said tariff schedules and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Tide Water Oil Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- United States v. Snow's United States Sample Express Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
- L. Mendelson Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1942
3Cited by7 opinions
- R. H. MacY & Co., Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
- F. B. Vandegrift & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
- Valentina, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
- Venetianaire Corp. of America v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
- Competitive Edge v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.