Legal Opinion
City of Los Angeles v. Hall
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 28, 1930No. Docket No. 7147PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE
COURT.—This action was brought by the City of Los Angeles to condemn for park purposes certain real property owned by defendant and appellant Leicester C. Hall. A jury awarded him the sum of $904.05 for the land taken, and an interlocutory judgment was entered accordingly. He moved for a new trial and also for an order dismissing the proceedings upon the ground that the plaintiff had failed to comply with the provisions of section 1251 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The motions were denied, and he has appealed from the judgment and the order denying his motion to dismiss.
The points relied…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. ReidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- People v. AzoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Siemsen v. Oakland, San Leandro, & Haywards Electric RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- California Southern Railroad v. Southern Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Shipman v. ForbesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Phipps v. PattersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- County of Los Angeles v. BartlettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Matoza v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931