Legal Opinion

State v. Butka

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided August 4, 1941No. 45495PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHale, J.

— This is an action in equity for specific performance of a contract for the conveyance of real estate. The defendants admit the signing of a contract but allege that the contract set out by the plaintiffs was not the entire contract but that the plans for the paving, Project FA-18, were a part of the contract ; that the plaintiffs had not complied with the contract in that at the time the contract was signed it was a part of the contract and within the contemplation of the parties that the new curve and junction between or connecting primary road No. 67 and the proposed new primary road No.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Elmore v. HigginsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1866
  2. McRobert v. BridgetSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
  3. Mealey v. KanealySupreme Court of Iowa · 1939
  4. Seeger v. ManifoldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  5. Chas. Counselman & Co. v. ReichartSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Harrison Sheet Steel Co., D/B/A Harrison Steel Cabinet Co. v. C. H. Morgan, D/B/A Morgan Investment Company, and H. E. Brown, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1959
  2. Aultman v. MeyersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1948
  3. Rhodes v. Iowa State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1959
  4. Stoffel v. StoffelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API