Legal Opinion

Mealey v. Kanealy

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 20, 1939No. 44566PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOliver, J.

This is an action at law by appellees against appellant for real estate commission based upon ,a written contract. Appellant, Lillian Kanealy, had certain negotiations with Thomas Berryman and wife for exchange of real estate. Appellees, J. R. Mealey and Charles M. Domback, represented both parties to the proposed exchange and submitted a contract for execution by said parties. The contract contained provisions relative to titles, abstracts, possession and conveyances as usually found in exchange agreements, the last paragraph having reference to appellees’ commission. As originally submitted…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Wisconsin Marine & Fire Insurance Co. Bank v. WilkinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Green Bay & Mississippi Canal Co. v. HewettWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Witt v. St. Paul & Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
  4. Holland v. National Automotive Fibres, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1937
  5. Green Bay & Mississippi Canal Co. v. HewittWisconsin Supreme Court · 1885

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Allen v. Highway Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1976
  2. Bates v. United Security Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1968
  3. Randolph v. Fireman's Fund Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1963
  4. Lum v. StevensHawaii Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Aultman v. MeyersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1948

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API