Legal Opinion

Haskins v. Young

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 26, 1915PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Suit to foreclose a mortgage of real estate and to obtain a deficiency judgment, if necessary, against the defendant, who was alleged to have assumed, as grantee, the payment of the mortgage note, brought to and tried by the Court of Common Pleas in New Haven County, Wolfe, J.; facts found and judgment rendered for the plaintiff, from which the defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtThayer, J.

The plaintiff asks for the foreclosure, by sale or strict foreclosure, of a mortgage given to him by one Allison, and for a deficiency judgment for the difference between the mortgage debt and the value of the mortgaged property as fixed by appraisal or sale, if the value as thus ascertained is insufficient to satisfy the debt. Allison is not a party to the action, which is brought against the defendant alone, it being alleged in the complaint that, on the same day that the mortgage was given, Allison, by his warranty deed of that date, conveyed the mortgaged premises to the defendant, and.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McGovern v. MitchellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1906
  2. Norwich Gas & Electric Co. v. City of NorwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1904
  3. Raffel v. ClarkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1913

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Lloyd v. LoweSupreme Court of Colorado · 1917
  2. Page v. HincheeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Guarantee Mortgage & Finance Co. v. CoxSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  4. Fishback v. J. C. Forkner Fig Gardens, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1934
  5. Gagner v. PetrauskasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API