Legal Opinion

Fishback v. J. C. Forkner Fig Gardens, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 6, 1934No. Docket No. 1297PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.

This is an action to foreclose a mortgage. The decree of foreclosure gave judgment against The J. C. Forkner Fig Gardens, Inc., for any deficiency remaining after sale of the mortgaged property, but not against the other defendants. We will hereafter refer to The J. C. Forkner Fig Gardens, Inc., as the defendant, and to the other defendants as the respondents. The appeal is taken from that portion of the judgment which refused judgment for a deficiency against respondents. An appeal by certain defendants was decided in Fishback v. J. G. Forkner Fig Gardens, Inc.; 218 Cal. 401 [23 Pac. (2d)…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. See v. North American Accident InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Albany City Savings Institution v. . BurdickNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  3. Elliott v. SackettSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  4. Woodard v. Glenwood Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Watson v. SutroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sato v. First National Bank of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
  2. Page v. HincheeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Beaver v. LedbetterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. Consolidated Realty Corp. v. DunlopCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  5. Smith v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API