Legal Opinion

State v. Battle

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 1, 1983No. 828SC342PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Judge.

Under his first assignment of error the defendant argues that the photographic lineups were impermissibly suggestive and it was error to admit testimony as to these lineups. The defendant argues under the same assignment of error that Tracey Grady’s in-court identification was tainted by the lineup and should have been excluded.

The defendant argues that it was impermissibly suggestive for the defendant to be the only person to appear in a different photograph in the first two lineups and for the change of the defendant’s photograph to be the only difference between the second and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. IrwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. State v. LeggettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. JoyceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  2. State v. BoozerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  3. State v. ClindingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  4. State v. CarrollCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  5. State v. CarrollCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API