Legal Opinion

State v. Carroll

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 21, 1983No. 8228SC853Published

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Judge.

Defendant contends the trial court should not have allowed the in-court identification of defendant as the offender by the prosecuting witness, Lisa Felmet. He argues first that the circumstances at the time of the assault were such that she could not have recognized defendant as the assailant. Defendant maintains that the evidence shows it was dark outside the apartment except for the porch light, and that all the lights inside the apartment had been extinguished; that the assailant was in the room for only 10 seconds; that the victim could see only a facial outline of him; that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. GraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  2. State v. LeggettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  3. State v. CobbSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  4. United States v. David L. LincolnCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
  5. State v. BattleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API