Legal Opinion

Smith v. Wright

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 7, 2015No. CV-15-227Published

1Opinion of the Court

Cite as

2015 Ark. 189

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CV-15-227 NATHANIEL SMITH, M.D., ET AL., Opinion Delivered May 7, 2015 APPELLANTS V. RESPONSES TO SMITH V. WRIGHT,

2015 Ark. 38

(per curiam) M. KENDALL WRIGHT AND JULIA E. WRIGHT, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON QUESTION ANSWERED; MOTION BEHALF OF THEIR MINOR TO WITHDRAW RESPONSE CHILDREN, G.D.W. AND P.L.W., ET MOOT; AMENDED MOTION TO AL. WITHDRAW RESPONSE APPELLEES GRANTED; MOTION TO DISMISS DENIED. KAREN R. BAKER, Associate Justice The Arkansas Constitution provides that “[t]he Supreme Court shall be composed of seven Justices.” However, in Smith v.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Shannon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  2. Smith v. Sidney Moncrief Pontiac, Buick, GMC Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  3. Campbell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  4. Loyd v. KnightSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  5. DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. SmelserSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API