Legal Opinion
In re E.D.
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided August 17, 2011No. 25594PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Moore, Judge.
{¶ 1} Appellant, the state of Ohio, appeals from the judgment of the Summit County Court of Common Pleas, Juvenile Division. This court affirms.
I
{¶ 2} E.D. was arrested for loitering for the purpose of engaging in drug-related activity on May 3 and May 7, 2010, in violation of Akron Codified Ordinance (“A.C.O.”) 138.26, a misdemeanor of the fourth degree if committed by an adult. On July 21, 2010, E.D. filed a motion asking the juvenile court to find A.C.O. 138.26 unconstitutional and to dismiss all charges. The trial court entered an order on August 24, 2010, dismissing E.D.’s…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Roberts v. United States JayceesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Smith v. GoguenSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. JacksonOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
- State v. GoodeOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- State v. JacobsOhio Court of Appeals · 2013