Legal Opinion
Pomerantz v. Schandler
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided April 8, 1983No. 984, Docket 83-7034PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Per curiam
The law firm of Golenbock and Bareli (“G & B”), a non-party which was defendant’s former legal counsel not only in this lawsuit but with respect to other matters, appeals from two orders of the Southern District of New York entered by Judge Charles E. Stewart directing it, over its objection, to release to Kramer, Coleman & Rhine (“KC & R”), new counsel for all of the defendants except Ira D. Schandler, a large number of documents subject to G & B’s attorney’s lien for approximately $66,361 for unpaid services and disbursements in this lawsuit and other matters. We reverse and remand for…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Bulk Oil Transports, Inc. v. Robins Dry Dock & Repair Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
- National Equipment Rental Ltd. v. Mercury Typesetting Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- In Re San Juan Gold, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
- Davis v. DavisU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1898
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- James K.J. Cheng v. Gaf CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Marsh, Day & Calhoun v. SolomonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. RandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
- 520 East 72nd Commercial Corp. v. 520 East 72nd Owners Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Dist. Attorney of N.Y. Cnty. v. Republic of the Phil.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.