Legal Opinion
Freeman v. Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Chicago
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided November 29, 2018No. 1:17-cv-04409Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION SHAKA FREEMAN, Plaintiff, Case No. 17 C 4409 v. Judge Harry D. Leinenweber METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Defendant Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago moves under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) to dismiss Plaintiff Shaka Freeman’s Fourth Amended Complaint (Dkt. Nos. 91, 92, 94). For the reasons stated herein, the Defendant’s Motion is granted. (Dkt. No. 97.) I. BACKGROUND This marks the first time the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Tamayo v. BlagojevichCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Kendale L. Adams v. City of IndianapolisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- Thomas v. Cook County Sheriff's DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.