Legal Opinion

La Plante v. Du Pont

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1923No. Docket No. 65PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to Houghton; O’Brien (Patrick H.), J. Case by Edward LaPlante against John F. DuPont for damages to plaintiff’s automobile. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.

The plaintiff, a resident of Hancock, owned a Chalmers automobile (1910 model). In the fall of 1919, he left it in defendant’s garage in Laurium for storage during the winter and also to have the mud guards and hood painted. It is his claim that it was then in good working condition. *345When he went after it in the spring of 1920 the painting had not been done. He testified that when he went again some weeks later—

“they were taking the car apart. * * * I says, ‘What’s the matter?’ ‘Oh,’ he said, ‘you stripped the gears last fall.’ I says, ‘if there is any gears stripped, you must have done it…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Peacock v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Murphy v. McGrawMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Johnson v. County of MuskegonMichigan Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Gillen v. Wakefield State BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Voyt v. Bekins Moving & Storage Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Johnson v. Fremont Canning Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Manzer v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950
  5. M. M. Gantz Co. v. AlexanderMichigan Supreme Court · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API