Legal Opinion

Murry v. Carlton

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 23, 1911No. 9831PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Card, J., entered May 2, 1911, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action to foreclose a mortgage.

1Opinion of the CourtDunbar, C. J.

— Por many years prior to the commencement of this action, the appellant, Lucy A. Carlton, was the owner in her own right of the real estate involved in this case. On the 14th day of October, 1908, Lucy A. Carlton and her husband executed a deed of said real estate to one Henry D. Carter. At the same date there was an agreement executed between Mr. and Mrs. Carlton and Henry D. Carter that, in consideration of the deed to Carter of the premises involved in this case, Carter would take care of and look after and support Mr. and Mrs. Carlton; the agree-men providing that the deed should be…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. Daly v. RizzuttoWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Bernard v. BensonWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Dow v. City of BallardWashington Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Peoples National Bank v. Birney's Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1989
  2. Miebach v. ColasurdoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983
  3. Reasoner v. FisikelliSupreme Court of Florida · 1934
  4. Lewis v. KujawaWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Crawford v. TimmWashington Supreme Court · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API