Legal Opinion · Dissent

Smith v. Smith

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 31, 1954Published

1DissentFboessel, J.

I dissent and vote to reverse upon the ground that the trial court erred in charging that the burden of proof rested wholly upon the plaintiff and in refusing to charge, as requested, that the defendant had a like burden before he could recover. Before either adversary party in the case of interpleader can recover, the burden of proof rests upon such party to establish his claim by a fair preponderance of the evidence. To put it otherwise: each claimant must carry his own burden and establish his own title; he may not rely on the weakness of the other’s claim (Clark v. Mosher, 107 N. Y. 118,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Clark v. . MosherNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. Wetzel v. CollinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1936
  3. Bata v. BataNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
  4. Savage v. McCauleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  5. Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. CahillAppellate Court of Illinois · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API