Legal Opinion

Bata v. Bata

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 23, 1953PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFroessel, J.

We are here confronted with an unfortunate family controversy between plaintiffs, the widow and only son of Thomas Bata, on the one hand, and defendant Jan Bata, Thomas’s twenty-year younger half brother, on the other. Thomas Bata (hereinafter referred to as Thomas) was an unusually capable Czech industrialist, the ninth in line of a family of shoemakers, dating from the sixteenth century. Though born in humble circumstances, he emerged from obscure beginnings as a provincial shoemaker and created a huge industrial shoe empire which had its inception in the town of Zlin, Province of Moravia,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Clark v. . MosherNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. Matter of Kaplan (Greenman)New York Court of Appeals · 1945

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Bata v. Central-Penn Nat. Bank of Phila.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  2. Bata v. Central-Penn National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. Bata v. BataSupreme Court of Delaware · 1960
  4. Bata v. HillCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1958
  5. Bata v. BataCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1960

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API