Legal Opinion

Sydney v. Linton

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 7, 1907No. Appeal, No. 59PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal, No. 59, Oct T., 1906, by defendant, from order of C. P. Armstrong Co., June T., 1897, No. 63, refusing to take off nonsuit in case of Algernon Edward Sydney, Ancillary Administrator of Samuel Lewis, to use of H. A. Colwell v. Elwina Linton. Foreign attachment in assumpsit. Before Smith, P. J., specially presiding. The opinion of the Supreme Court states the case. Error assigned was refusal to take off nonsuit.

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

Following a suggestion made by this court when the case was here last (207 Pa. 320) the learned judge below on petition, answer and rule to show cause, awarded an issue to determine what payments had been made on the judgment, by the defendant or by her co-obligor, for which she was entitled to credit. This issue was framed by the court September 10, 1904, and was put on the trial list for December term of that year, but the plaintiff in the issue, present appellant, failing to appear it was continued to the March term, 1905, when it was again continued on appellant’s application,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lewis v. LintonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Crist v. Director General of Railroads, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Crawford County1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API