Legal Opinion

Lewis v. Linton

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 4, 1904No. Appeal, No. 149PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal, No. 149, Oct. T., 1903, by defendant, from order of C. P. Armstrong. Co., J une T., 1897, No. 63, dismissing petition to stay a writ of execution in case of Ada Hannah Lewis et al., Executors of Samuel Lewis, Deceased, v. Elwina Linton. Petition to stay writ of execution. The opinion of the Supreme Court states the case. Error assigned was the order of the court dismissing the petition.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mb. Justice Mesteezat,

Mrs. Linton, the defendant and appellant, and Thomas Cross, both citizens and residents of England, made a joint and several promissory note, dated June 10, 1896, and payable six months after date to Samuel Lewis, also a citizen and resident of England. Default in payment having been made, Lewis brought suit against Cross in England on the note and recovered judgment against him. Subsequently he issued a writ of foreign attachment in assumpsit on the note against Mrs. Linton in the court of common pleas of Armstrong county, this state, and after a jury trial, a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lewis v. LintonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Simon v. SorrentinoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  2. Betts v. Young Men's Christian Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  3. Morgan Guaranty Trust Co. v. StaatsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Link Building & Loan Ass'n v. MelnickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  5. Durso v. FioriniSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API