Legal Opinion · Dissent
Klanseck v. Anderson Sales & Service, Inc.
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided July 9, 1984No. Docket 64816Published
1DissentT. M. Burns, P.J.
I am unable to agree with the majority’s finding that a violation *88of the motorcycle license statute constitutes negligence per se. As stated in Anno: Lack of proper automobile registration or operator’s license as evidence of operator’s negligence, 29 ALR2d 963, 965-966:
"The overwhelming weight of authority * * * is to the effect that failure to have an operator’s license on the part of the person operating a motor vehicle involved in an accident is not evidence of negligence, inasmuch as violation of the statute requiring such a license has no causal connection with the accident and is…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Zeni v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
- People v. GrishamMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. NussMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
- Turri v. BozekMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
- Ross v. AlexanderMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977