Legal Opinion
Miller v. Wulf
District Court, D. Utah
Decided February 2, 2015No. Case No. 1:12-cv-119-DNPublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING [29] RECEIVER’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND [50] DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
DAVID NUFFER, District Judge.
Defendant Arthur S. Wulf (“Wulf’) is an investor in Impact Payment Systems, LLC and Impact Cash, LLC (together, “Impact”). Plaintiff is the court-appointed receiver in SEC v. Clark.1 The Receiver filed this ancillary action seeking the return as fraudulent transfer, the amount Mr. Wulf received from Impact which exceeds the amount of his original investment together with prejudgment interest. After a careful review of the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Cunningham v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Scholes v. LehmannCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Warfield v. ByronCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
- Merrill v. Abbott (In Re Independent Clearing House Co.)District Court, D. Utah · 1987
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- SEC. & Exch. Comm'n v. ScovilleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Traffic Monsoon, LLCDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2017
- Gillman v. Russell (In re Twin Peaks Financial Services, Inc.)District Court, D. Utah · 2016
- Anchorage Lending CA LLC v. Scott D. Bennett, et al.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2026
- Hafen v. BrimleyDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2021
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.