Brann v. Hart
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Case 100 — APPEAL TO CIRCUIT COURT APPEAL FROM PENDI,ETON CIRCUIT COURT. 1. The special act of the legislature prohibiting the sale of all spirituous, vinous or malt liquors in the Collensville Precinct in the county of Pendleton is repealed by the general revenue law allowing distillers in good faith of spirituous liquors to retail in quantities not less than a quart, the product of their own manufacture upon the payment of $75 license tax.
Read the full summary
Case 100 — APPEAL TO CIRCUIT COURT APPEAL FROM PENDI,ETON CIRCUIT COURT. 1. The special act of the legislature prohibiting the sale of all spirituous, vinous or malt liquors in the Collensville Precinct in the county of Pendleton is repealed by the general revenue law allowing distillers in good faith of spirituous liquors to retail in quantities not less than a quart, the product of their own manufacture upon the payment of $75 license tax. (Session Acts 1879, vol. 1, page 502; Kentucky Statutes, secs. 4205-4224, 4267; constitution, secs. 59, 61.) 2. The special act in regard to the sale of…
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGE LEWIS
DELIVERED THE OPINION OF THE COURT.
By an act of March 20, 1880, entitled “An act to prohibit the sale of spirituous, vinous* or malt liquors, or mixtures of either, in the seventh magisterial district of Pendleton county,” it was made unlawful for any person to sell spirituous, vinous or malt liquors, or mixtures of either, or to obtain a merchant’s coffee-house, tavern, or other license, to sell within limits of seventh magisterial district in Pendleton county.
In 1893, appellant, Brann, operating a distillery in that district applied to Pendleton County Court for a distiller’s…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Board of Council v. RaumCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
- Buskirk v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
- Ingram v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917