Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Poillon

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided July 2, 1937PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Delehanty, S.

Objectants question the conduct of the trustees in respect of an investment in a whole mortgage originally having a face value of $3,500 on which the principal unpaid is now $3,000 and in respect of an investment in a mortgage participation certificate now in default.

There is no criticism of the original investment in the whole mortgage of $3,500. The account reports that investment, the collection of $500 on account of principal and a present face value of $3,000. In effect the surviving trustee says that the mortgage is now worthless. Concededly nothing has been done by her to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Croft v. . WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  2. Chesterman v. . EylandNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  3. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of Guaranty Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
  4. In re the Estate of DalsimerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
  5. In re the Estate of BaxterNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Matter of Estate of CarterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
  2. In re the Estate of PoillonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937
  3. In re the Estate of LaingNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API