Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Dalsimer

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided August 5, 1936PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Delehanty, S.

By consent of counsel testimony was taken in solido in these three contested accounting proceedings. The same issues are raised in each —1 except for one variance which will be separately mentioned.

The record requires consideration of mortgage investments made by the accounting trustee in respect of some aspects of which diligent and competent counsel have found no controlling authorities. Since the matters here in controversy will increasingly engage the attention of the courts until the effects of the general depression have been liquidated it will be a desirable outcome of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Matter of Union Trust Co. (Hoffman Estate)New York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of First Trust & Deposit Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
  3. In re the Estate of WaxelbaumNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank of Birmingham v. BashamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  2. Downing EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  3. Pike v. Camden Trust Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1940
  4. In re the Estate of Van DeusenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
  5. In re the Estate of PoillonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API