Legal Opinion

Simpson v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided October 12, 1911No. 530; No. 531PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 7111 (T. D. 31001).

1Opinion of the Court

Smith, Judge,

delivered the. opinion of the court:

Certain cotton waste imported at Philadelphia was classified by the collector of customs as cotton waste advanced in value and assessed for duty at 20 per cent ad valorem under the provisions of paragraph 313 of the tariff act of August 5, 1909, the part of which material to the case is as follows:

313. * * * Cotton waste and flocks manufactured or otherwise advanced in value, twenty per centum ad valorem.

*223The importers protested that the merchandise was not cotton waste advanced in value, but that it was cotton waste entitled to free entry under…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Drakenfeld & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919
  2. United States v. Rice Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919
  3. Farnsworth v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963
  4. United States v. Brown & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1920
  5. United States v. Maine Central RailroadCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API