Legal Opinion

Laurance v. Mitchell

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 11, 1943No. 4 Div. 303PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOULDIN, Justice.

The appeal is from a decree overruling demurrers to a bill in equity.

Broadly speaking, the purpose of the bill is to clear up and define the title of the owner of an alleged reversionary estate in lands in fee subject to a life estate still pending. The substance of the bill may be summarized as follows:

The lands were owned by Mollie Daniels Williams. Upon her death intestate on October 14, 1935, the title passed to complainant, Arlina Mitchell, a niece, and sole heir at law of the decedent, subject to a statutory life estate in the surviving husband, John Williams, who still…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Keenum v. DodsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  2. Teal v. MixonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  3. Jenkins v. Woodward Iron Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1915

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Freed v. SalladeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  2. Jacobs v. MurphySupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  3. Howton v. HowtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  4. John Skidmore v. Billy Wayne Skidmore, Jr. (Appeal from Marshall Circuit Court: CV-23-900277).Supreme Court of Alabama · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API