Legal Opinion

Teal v. Mixon

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 18, 1936No. 4 Div. 892PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

The bill in this suit seeks to have a cloud removed from the title to the land in which complainants assert the reversionary ownership after the death of their .father, who, it is alleged, has a life estate which has been acquired from him by respondent. It alleges that their father, David Teal, owner of a life estate,, has sold the land to various and sundry persons, and that respondent has acquired such interest through various convey anees, and that he is claiming an absolute title in fee, but only owns such life estate of David Teal, and is in possession of it. The prayer…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Gill v. MoreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  2. Woodstock Iron Co. v. FullenwiderSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
  3. Winters v. PowellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  4. Dallas Compress Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  5. Lansden v. BoneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Mudd v. LanierSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
  2. Ussery v. DarrowSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  3. Ohio Oil Co. v. Wyoming AgencyWyoming Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Duncan v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  5. Alabama Independent Service Station Ass'n v. McDowellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API