Legal Opinion
In re Atterbury
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 31, 1991PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an accounting proceeding pursuant to SCPA 2110, (1) the petitioners appeal from so much of a decree of the Surrogate’s Court, Suffolk County (Signorelli, S.), dated February 5, 1990, as limited executors’ commissions to the sum of $14,475.02, which represented a "single commission to be shared among the three executors”, and (2) Cruser, Hills, Hills & Besunder appeals from so much of the same decree as limited compensation for legal services to $6,000.
Ordered that the decree is modified, on the law, by deleting the second decretal paragraph thereof and substituting therefor a provision…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In re the Estate of WeinstockNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- In re the Estate of VerplanckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- In re Von HofeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- In re the Estate of LanyiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- In re the Estate of ThronNew York Surrogate's Court · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re the Estate of EsbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- In re the Estate of ShawAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- In re CoryaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991