In re the Estate of Shaw
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
— In a probate proceeding, the objectants appeal from a decree of the Surrogate’s Court, Queens County (Laurino, S.), dated May 8, 1990, which, after a hearing, inter alia, dismissed their objections to the issuance of letters testamentary to Jules J. Haskel.
Ordered that the decree is affirmed, with costs payable by the estate.
In this proceeding, the testator’s surviving wife, daughter, and son object to the issuance of letters testamentary to Jules J. Haskel, on the ground that he manipulated the testator into designating him as a coexecutor, and that he failed to disclose to the testator…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In re the Estate of WeinstockNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- In Re Proving the Will of LelandNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- In Re Proving the Will of FloodNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- In re the Probate of the Will of FossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
- In re the Estate of MarshAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In re Estate of PalmaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- In re the Estate of HunterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re the Estate of ShephardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- In re the Estate of MorningstarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- In re the Estate of RimlandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.