Legal Opinion
Ainsworth v. Ainsworth
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 10, 1933PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSears, P. J.
The order appealed from reduces from $500 per month to $325 per month the allowance to the plaintiff for maintenance and support provided in a judgment entered on September 1, 1931. Were the question of the amount to be paid henceforth to the plaintiff for her support and maintenance before us upon this appeal, we should affirm the order, but we have reached the conclusion that the judgment itself which the order attempts in this respect to modify is void because the court was without jurisdiction to grant it. The judgment recites an action pending between the parties and a stipulation of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Erkenbrach v. . ErkenbrachNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Johnson v. . JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Stoddard v. . StoddardNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Ramsden v. . RamsdenNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Kamman v. KammanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kingston v. KingstonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
- American Cities Co. v. StevensonNew York Supreme Court · 1946
- Neville v. NevilleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
- In re the Estate of AinsworthNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
- Neville v. NevilleNew York Supreme Court · 1940
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.