Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Hill

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 3, 2001No. 1143, Sept. Term, 2000PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SALMON, Judge.

In this appeal we are asked to decide whether the fireman’s rule is applicable when police officers sue a defendant who intentionally harms them. Other related issues are presented, viz, whether contributory negligence or assumption of risk are valid defenses to a personal injury claim arising out of intentional torts. In addition, we are called upon to interpret section 19-513(e) of the Insurance article of the Maryland Code (1997). The statutory construction issue is: When a plaintiff receives a civil judgment and a workers’ compensation award arising out of the same incident,…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Oaks v. ConnorsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  2. Krauth v. Israel Geller and Buckingham Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  3. Juhl v. AiringtonTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Marriott Employees Federal Credit Union v. Motor Vehicle AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  5. Degren v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kiriakos v. Phillips Dankos v. StapfCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016
  2. Rude v. Dancing Crab at Washington Harbour, LPCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
  3. Ipsen v. Diamond Tree ExpertsUtah Supreme Court · 2020
  4. White v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  5. Coleman v. Soccer Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API