State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Hill
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
SALMON, Judge.
In this appeal we are asked to decide whether the fireman’s rule is applicable when police officers sue a defendant who intentionally harms them. Other related issues are presented, viz, whether contributory negligence or assumption of risk are valid defenses to a personal injury claim arising out of intentional torts. In addition, we are called upon to interpret section 19-513(e) of the Insurance article of the Maryland Code (1997). The statutory construction issue is: When a plaintiff receives a civil judgment and a workers’ compensation award arising out of the same incident,…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Oaks v. ConnorsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- Krauth v. Israel Geller and Buckingham Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- Juhl v. AiringtonTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- Marriott Employees Federal Credit Union v. Motor Vehicle AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- Degren v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kiriakos v. Phillips Dankos v. StapfCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016
- Rude v. Dancing Crab at Washington Harbour, LPCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
- Ipsen v. Diamond Tree ExpertsUtah Supreme Court · 2020
- White v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2008
- Coleman v. Soccer Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.