Hunt v. DelCollo
Court of Chancery of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN, Vice Chancellor.
Defendants in this action have moved to dismiss under Rule 12, Del.C.Ann., on the grounds that the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, and also for the additional reasons that the Court lacks jurisdiction, that Plaintiffs are guilty of laches and for failure of Plaintiffs to join an indispensable party. Defendants concede that for the purpose of their motions, the facts well pleaded by the complaint must be accepted as true. Hessler, Inc. v. Ellis, 39 Del.Ch. 517, 167 A.2d 848 (1961). The basic facts thus admitted are as follows.
During…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Danby v. Osteopathic Hospital Ass'n of DelawareSupreme Court of Delaware · 1954
- Danby v. Osteopathic Hospital Ass'n of DelawareCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1953
- Morgan v. WellsCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1951
- Danby v. Osteopathic Hospital Ass'nCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1953
- Jackson v. RichardsCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1942
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Flying Diamond Oil Corp. v. Newton Sheep Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1989
- Joan N. Narvesen v. John Anthony PalmerCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2025