Legal Opinion

Schofield v. Twining

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania

Decided January 29, 1904No. 83PublishedCited by 1 opinion

■ ’ - At Law. Motion by defendant for judgment upon reserved point 1 notwithstanding the verdict.

1Opinion of the Court

J. B. McPHERSON, District Judge.

The plaintiff sued, as re"ceiver of the First National Bank of Asbury Park, to recover upon a promissory note given by the defendant, to the bank more than six years before the action was brought.'’ The statute of limitations-was *489set up as a defense, • to which the plaintiff offered evidence in reply that payments of interest were made upon the note at several times within the statutory period; the last payment having been made in Jauuary, 1900. If these payments were made by the defendant, there^ fore, or on his behalf, with his knowledge and consent, they are…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Central Pennsylvania Telephone & Supply Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
  2. Whiting & Co. v. LakeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1879
  3. Bush v. StowellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1872
  4. Clark v. BurnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1878
  5. Lazarus v. FullerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1879

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Guaranty Bank & Trust Co. v. HeiderichSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API