Lazarus v. Fuller
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Assumpsit by William Lazarus, administrator of George Schuyler, deceased, against Orange M. Fuller, executor of J. W. Fuller, deceased, on the following promissory note : “$500. -Catasauqua, April 8th 1870. One year after date we, or either of us, promise to pay to George Schuyler, or order, five hundred dollars, with interest, without defalcation, for value received. David A. .Tombler. f 26 ct. Internal ) • J W. FUDDER.” x wxiiujik. (Revenue Stamp./ x wxiiujik.
Read the full summary
Assumpsit by William Lazarus, administrator of George Schuyler, deceased, against Orange M. Fuller, executor of J. W. Fuller, deceased, on the following promissory note : “$500. -Catasauqua, April 8th 1870. One year after date we, or either of us, promise to pay to George Schuyler, or order, five hundred dollars, with interest, without defalcation, for value received. David A. .Tombler. f 26 ct. Internal ) • J W. FUDDER.” x wxiiujik. (Revenue Stamp./ x wxiiujik. On the back of said mote are the following endorsements:, “April 1st 1871, paid interest one year, $30. April 3d 1872, paid interest…
1Opinion of the Court
The judgment of the Supreme Court was entered, March 24th 1879,
2Per curiam
We affirm the judgment upon the authority of Clark v. Burn et al., 4 Norris 502.
Judgment affirmed.
3Cited by2 opinions
- White v. Pittsburgh Vein Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- Schofield v. TwiningU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1904