Legal Opinion

Redhead, Wellslager & Co. v. Pratt

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 21, 1887PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Buena Vista Gireuit Court. This is an action in equity, and involves the question as to the validity of the sale of a stock of drugs made by the defendants Pratt & Barney to the defendants Rae & Hunter. There was a decree finding that the sale was void for fraud as to the plaintiffs, who are creditors of Pratt & Barney.

1Opinion of the CourtRothrock, J.

Pratt & Barney were for some time in the drug business at Sioux Rapids. On the 9th day of July, 1885, they executed a chattel mortgage upon their stock of merchandise to the Storm Lake Bank, to secure the payment of $827. On the 10th day of July, 1885, they executed a chattel mortgage upon their stock to D. D. Brooks & Son, to secure the payment of $190, and another chattel mortgage upon the same property to Sarah Scott, to secure the payment of $125; and on the same day they sold their entire stock to Rae & Hunter for the sum of $600, subject to the said mortgages. Within a few days…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jones v. HetheringtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1877
  2. Zimmerman v. HeinrichsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Harris v. BrinkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  2. McNally v. Emmetsburg National BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
  3. Knabe v. KirchnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940
  4. Gamet & Ogden v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  5. Flood v. BollmeierSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API