Legal Opinion

Canavin v. Naik

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 10, 1986No. Civ. A. 85-4263PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

DITTER, Judge.

Plaintiff alleges that defendant, Dr. Sudhir D. Naik, intentionally sexually assault ed and battered her under the guise of conducting a medical examination while both were employed by Conrail. Defendant denies that his examination of plaintiff was improper and has brought a third party action against Conrail for contribution or indemnification. Conrail and Dr. Naik have each moved for summary judgment on the third party action. Alternatively, Dr. Naik has moved for summary judgment on plaintiffs complaint. For the reasons which follow, I will grant Conrail’s…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Richard J. Griffin and Mary Jane Griffin, His Wife v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
  2. Thompson v. FoxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Embrey v. Borough of West MifflinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Cage v. New York Central Railroad CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1967
  5. Delano v. IvesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1941

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bank v. City of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Toll Brothers, Inc. v. Panitch, Schwarze, Jacobs & Nadel, P.C., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API