Legal Opinion

St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. Knight

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 1, 1899PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the Comity Court of Hunt. Tried below before Hon. W. H. Ragsdale.

1Opinion of the Court

KEY, Associate Justice.

This is a grass-burning suit. The verdict and judgment were for the plaintiff, and the railroad company has appealed. The trial court refused to give the following special instruction, requested by appellant: “If the jury find from the evidence that plaintiff’s grass was destroyed by fire, caused by sparks escaping from an engine being used on its line of railway setting fire to grass, weeds, or other combustible matter on its right of way, and if they further find that the defendant had used reasonable care and diligence to prevent the accumulation of and to remove,…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Chenoweth v. Southern Pac. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  3. Houston & Texas Central Railway Co. v. TrammellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1902
  4. Guaranty State Bank of Hutchins v. BeardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  5. Rowe v. TreudeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API