Legal Opinion · Dissent

Car & General Ins. v. Keal Driveway Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 20, 1943No. 10420Published

1DissentHutcheson, Circuit Judge

I cannot agree with the conclusion of the majority that on the facts of this case “It was prejudicial error to submit the issue [of contributory negligence] without charging the jury on the rule of sudden emergency”. In the first place, I think the evidence, as a matter of law, established that Campbell was contributorily negligent and a verdict should have been instructed on that point. City of Tallahassee v. Fortune, 3 Fla. 19, 52 Am.Dec. 358; Lindsay v. Thomas, 128 Fla. 293, 174 So. 418; Stanford v. Atlantic Life Ins. Co., 5 Cir., 109 F.2d 428.

Campbell’s testimony was to the effect that…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Carpenter ex rel. Carpenter v. Campbell Automobile Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  2. Lindsay v. ThomasSupreme Court of Florida · 1937
  3. City of Tallahassee v. FortuneSupreme Court of Florida · 1850
  4. Bolton v. WellsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Gajewski v. LightnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API