Legal Opinion

Gajewski v. Lightner

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 28, 1941No. Appeal, 60PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Drew,

Plaintiff, Walter Gajewski, was injured when struck by an automobile driven by defendant, Edward M. Lightner, as he was crossing Penn Avenue in the City of Pittsburgh. This action in trespass was brought to recover damages therefor, and, at the trial, a verdict in the amount of $700 was rendered in plaintiff’s favor. From the action of the court en banc in refusing plaintiff’s motion for a new trial and granting the motion of defendant for judgment non obstante veredicto, plaintiff took this appeal.

The circumstances of this unfortunate accident, as shown by the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Casey v. SicilianoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Fearn v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  3. Carnevale v. McCrady-rodgers Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  4. Danks v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  5. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Auel v. WhiteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. Rucheski v. WisswesserSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  3. Pinto v. Bell Fruit Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  4. Grgona v. RushtonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  5. Morris v. Harmony Short Line Motor Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API