Micro Chemical, Inc. v. Lextron, Inc.
District Court, D. Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BOLAND, United States Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before me on Plaintiffs Motion to Compel and Supporting Brief (the “Motion to Compel”) filed June 1, 2000. The defendant has responded, and I heard argument of counsel by telephone. As specified below, the Motion to Compel is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.
Although the Motion to Compel addresses a number of issues, all but three were withdrawn. The three remaining issues are: (1) whether William C. Pratt, president of the plaintiff corporation (“Micro Chemical”), may be present at the entry upon land of the facilities of Lextron,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Belcher v. Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1978
- State ex rel. Crawford v. MoodyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972
- Giorgi v. Union Free School District No. 32Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
3Cited by3 opinions
- Northbrook Digital, LLC v. Vendio Services, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2008
- Gillett v. ConnerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- Gillett v. ConnerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006