Legal Opinion

Gillett v. Conner

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 8, 2006No. 55796-3-IPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDwyer, J.

¶1 Paul and Gail Gillett, owners of residential property, filed a complaint including a claim for nuisance against their neighbor, Katie Fletcher, and her friend, Michael Conner, Jr. The superior court subsequently granted the Gilletts’ motion to compel discovery under CR 34, permitting them to inspect and photograph the interior and exterior of Fletcher’s residence, all outbuildings, and the land. This court granted discretionary review to resolve issues concerning the correct procedure for trial courts to follow when presented with a CR 34 discovery request. We find that discovery orders…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Seattle Times Co. v. RhinehartSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Washington State Physicians Insurance Exchange & Ass'n v. Fisons Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Rhinehart v. Seattle Times Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1982
  4. New York State Ass'n for Retarded Children, Inc. v. CareyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  5. Marjorie Louise Dabney v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Incorporated, and Honeywell, IncCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Merriam v. Demoulas Super Markets, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013
  2. Gillett v. ConnerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  3. In Re Kimberly-Clark Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2007
  4. Weiss v. LonnquistCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  5. Kreidler v. Cascade National InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API