Legal Opinion
In Re Perry
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas
Decided April 21, 2009No. 19-31044PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION REGARDING DEBTOR’S OBJECTIONS TO PROOFS OF CLAIM NUMBER 38, 39, AND 40
JEFF BOHM, Bankruptcy Judge.
I. Introduction
Sour grapes and hindsight do not a lawsuit make. Three investors have filed proofs of claim in this Chapter 11 case alleging that they were induced to purchase class B shares in a limited partnership by way of a prospectus that contains omissions of material fact in violation of the Texas Securities Act. The investors contend that the debtor is personally liable for these omissions as a “control person” of the general partner of the limited partnership. More…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,722 Securities and Exchange Commission v. The Seaboard Corporation, Etc., Admiralty Fund and Admiralty Fund Growth Series Litigation Trust, Cross-Claimant/appellant v. Hugh Johnson & Company, Inc., Hugh Johnson, Norman Michael Keiser, and Ernst& Ernst, Cross-Defendants/appelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Zobrist v. Coal-X, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
- Weatherly v. Deloitte & Touche, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1995
- Brown v. E.F. Hutton Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- John W. Mathews v. Kidder, Peabody & Co., Inc., A Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Wallace v. Perry (In Re Perry)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2010
- Michael Murphy v. Ernest Reynolds III, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2011
- Michael Murphy v. Ernest Reynolds III, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2011