Legal Opinion
(PS) Moorhead II v. Hernandez
District Court, E.D. California
Decided January 30, 2025No. 2:24-cv-00344Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 BRADLEY MOORHEAD II, No. 2:24-cv-00344-TLN-SCR 11 Plaintiffs, 12 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 13 RAUL HERNANDEZ, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 Plaintiff is proceeding in this matter pro se, and this matter is referred to the undersigned 17 pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636. Now before the Court are Defendants’ 18 Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 4), Motion to Strike (ECF No. 11), and request to file a reply (ECF 19 No. 8). Plaintiff has filed a motion to participate in e-filing…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Moss v. U.S. Secret ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.