Legal Opinion

Danny Sellers v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided March 25, 2013No. 12-855CPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction; RCFC 12(b)(1); Federal Tort Claims Act; Tort Claims; Eighth Amendment; Constitutional Claims; Transfer to District Court; Pro Se; Bad-Faith Conduct; Sanction Pursuant to Court’s Inherent Power

OPINION AND ORDER

HEWITT, Chief Judge

I. Background

Plaintiffs Danny Sellers and Tyrone Nunn, appearing pro se, filed the above-captioned ease on December 10, 2012, 1 which they have identified as a “class action” suit. See Fed. Tort Claim (Complaint or Compl.), Docket Number (Dkt. No.) 1, at 1 (capitalization and emphasis omitted); see also id. at 2 (stating that the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  5. Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Gloria Treviño, Individually and as Next Friend for Robert Rodriguez Treviño v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
  2. Coleman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  3. Parker v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
  4. Major W.D. Foster v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
  5. Strand v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API