Legal Opinion

Hatala v. Markiewicz

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided November 1, 1966No. File 144235PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTedesco, J.

Plaintiff Joseph A. Hatala, the administrator of the estate of Baby Girl Hatala, alleges that the baby, en ventre sa mere, was due to be born in about a month or two and that as a result of the defendant’s negligent operation of an automobile the child was killed and caused to be stillborn. The defendant demurred to this complaint on the ground that there is no right of action to a stillborn child or to the representative of such stillborn child’s estate for injury or death which occurred to the child before birth. The demurrer admits for the purpose of the present proceeding to the truth of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Dietrich v. Inhabitants of NorthamptonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
  2. Verkennes v. CornieaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  3. State Ex Rel. Odham v. ShermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  4. Fowler v. WoodwardSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1964
  5. Stidam v. AshmoreOhio Court of Appeals · 1959

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Justus v. AtchisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Summerfield v. Superior Court, Maricopa Cty.Arizona Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Nealis v. BairdSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  4. Krishnan v. SepulvedaTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Amadio v. LevinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API