Legal Opinion

Chiles v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided February 26, 1935No. 7 Div. 93PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRICKEN, Presiding Judge.

From a judgment of conviction for grand larceny, this appeal was taken.

Appellant was charged, in count 1 of the indictment, with the offense of feloniously taking and carrying away two bales of cotton, of the value of $115, the personal property of J. I-I. Watson. The judgment of conviction was had upon that count.

The corpus delicti was sufficiently established by the state’s evidence, and this evidence also tended to connect this appellant with the commission of the offense complained- of. The appellant, however, strenuously denied any knowledge of, or participation…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gassenheimer v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
  2. Way v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
  3. Thompson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  4. Patterson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  5. Jarvis v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Berger v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1941
  2. Wilson v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1942
  3. Carnold v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1992
  4. Mullins v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1944
  5. United States v. Quinn L. PolsinelliCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API